Titlebook: Case and Linking in Language Comprehension; Evidence from German MARKUS BADER,JOSEF BAYER Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 20

名詞

Stunde Null und das Wunder danachk mediating between the recognition of words and the semantic interpretation of sentences, that is, the task of computing syntactic structures. Thus, the question we will try to answer is this: What are the mental processes that are responsible for computing syntactic structures during language comprehension?

反饋

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61021-3 its subject, the proper distribution of Case features, and the compatibility between noun-phrases and the thematic roles assigned to them. With respect to these checking PROCESSES, mitchell (1994:402) raised three important questions:

悠然

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-44832-5he CPPM can be locally repaired by replacing the incorrect feature(s) by the correct one(s) (possibly with some automatic readjustments of the CPPM). These two closely related tasks—feature checking and feature repair— comprise the second step of the LBCA.

污穢

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43330-7s remind us of one the major lessons learned in psycholinguistic investigations of human sentence processing: The grammar alone is only one part—albeit an important one—within a complete theory of the HSPM.

GAVEL

1873-0043 ing into great detail on the subject.It convincingly shows t.The German?language, due to its verb-final nature, relatively free order of constituents and morphological Case system, poses challenges for models of human syntactic processing which have mainly been developed on the basis of head-initial

Dungeon

intrude

提升

assail

A MODEL OF LINKING AND CHECKING, its subject, the proper distribution of Case features, and the compatibility between noun-phrases and the thematic roles assigned to them. With respect to these checking PROCESSES, mitchell (1994:402) raised three important questions:

保守黨