Titlebook: British Working-Class Writing for Children; Scholarship Boys in Haru Takiuchi Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 20

obsess

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)British Working-Class Writing for Children影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)British Working-Class Writing for Children影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)British Working-Class Writing for Children網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)British Working-Class Writing for Children網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)British Working-Class Writing for Children被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)British Working-Class Writing for Children被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)British Working-Class Writing for Children年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)British Working-Class Writing for Children年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)British Working-Class Writing for Children讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)British Working-Class Writing for Children讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

cluster

Introduction,cholarship boys’, individuals from the working class who were educated out of their class through grammar school education. These writers have rarely been seriously examined in terms of their representation of the working class, despite the fact that class is often at the centre of their works. The

SLUMP

搏斗

培養(yǎng)

Education and Uncertainty in Aidan Chamber’s ,wn childhood and adolescent experiences. Chapter 4 highlights scholarship boy experiences through examining Aidan Chambers’ .e (.). Drawing on a combination of archival material, interviews with the author and studies of class and education, Chapter 4 highlights how Chambers used his own experiences

初學(xué)者

懶鬼才會(huì)衰弱

Ancestor

Class and Children’s Book Criticismm, until the late 1960s, indirectly restricted the emergence of working-class children’s books. Therefore, some scholarship boy writers consciously engaged in children’s book criticism to change the middle-class dominance of the field. Drawing on archival material and interviews, this chapter highli

phlegm

The Conclusion of ,: Critical Ignorance of Class Angere reception history of Alan Garner’s . (.). In the 1960s, the ending of the novel, which strongly highlights a Welsh scholarship boy’s social anger, was widely interpreted as a statement of the devastating and lasting impact of class conflict in Britain. Since the 1970s, however, this ending has mor

stress-response