找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate; Journalists Reportin Binakuromo Ogbebor Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 臉紅
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 17:01:32 | 只看該作者
Linking Historical and Maritime Archaeology,the UK as a way of highlighting recurrent trends in efforts at reforming press regulation and the outcomes of such attempts. To this end, this chapter discusses the history of press regulation in Britain, the British press system (introducing the three major newspaper classifications—broadsheets, mi
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:49:13 | 只看該作者
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 23:35:21 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33600-1the . phone hacking scandal and the Leveson Inquiry. A total of 870 news articles on the media reform debate from six British national newspapers were examined. Based on her findings, the author argues that the public needs to play a greater and more pragmatic role in ensuring press accountability.
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 06:14:43 | 只看該作者
Linking Historical and Maritime Archaeology, to efforts by the press to protect news paradigms rather than critically examining them to see if there is a need for change (Bennet et al. 1985, cited in Carlson, Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. .(4), 349–368, 2015,
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 10:31:12 | 只看該作者
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 13:09:42 | 只看該作者
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 17:01:56 | 只看該作者
Models of Container Port Security,y. Using content analysis, critical discourse analysis and a theoretical framework that consists of the public sphere concept and the gatekeeping theory, this chapter reveals that the coverage of the press reform debate was characterised by a doubly narrow spectrum of sources. It also found that the
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 23:19:44 | 只看該作者
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 02:02:07 | 只看該作者
,Gr??enentwicklung der Containerschiffe,n serve as a democratic public sphere where diverse voices can have proportionate access to the press reform debate, the media used their gatekeeping powers to advance their views while limiting or preventing arguments that were against their self-interest from gaining entrance into the public spher
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 07:27:17 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37265-1Leveson Inquiry; News of the World; Phone hacking; Phone hacking scandal; Media policy; Media and democra
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-18 03:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
咸丰县| 潢川县| 左贡县| 民县| 大英县| 正镶白旗| 晋州市| 安龙县| 象山县| 洛浦县| 陇西县| 固原市| 水城县| 定日县| 大姚县| 大新县| 建瓯市| 辽宁省| 温州市| 隆昌县| 平定县| 镇宁| 南岸区| 上杭县| 阳原县| 平安县| 玉林市| 旌德县| 辽宁省| 溧阳市| 灵武市| 庄河市| 依安县| 万州区| 桐梓县| 共和县| 阿克| 永春县| 绥阳县| 罗江县| 思茅市|