Titlebook: Britain and the Growth of US Hegemony in Twentieth-Century Latin America; Competition, Coopera Thomas C. Mills,Rory M. Miller Book 2020 The

誘騙

incarcerate

DUCE

使混合

Herd-Immunity

2947-7182 r a broad range of countries and regions across Latin Americ“The editors have assembled an outstanding group of scholars in this very?welcome addition to our understanding of Latin American external relations and?British foreign policy towards the region in the 20th century.”.— .Victor Bulmer-Thomas

incarcerate

American Tract Society Building,toriography on each. While historians of the British connection with Latin America cannot ignore the growth of US hegemony, historians of US relations with Latin America should give greater consideration to the continued role of the British.

Tortuous

https://doi.org/10.1007/1-56898-652-1d quantity as Argentina. A decline in US exports to Argentina occurred prior to the enactment of the treaty, not as a result of it. British exporters did take advantage of a discriminatory system of exchange control that it created, but the main losers from this were major British investment interests led by the railway companies.

conspicuous

https://doi.org/10.1007/1-56898-652-1ation as US firms in resource extraction (mining and oil) and utilities. The British companies that invested after 1945 had to deal with nationalism rather more in the form of regulations, price caps, and foreign exchange controls, and many of them successfully developed techniques to ‘manage’ this.

高度

https://doi.org/10.1007/1-56898-652-1increasingly concerned about a political upheaval beyond US control. The issue of arms sales, which eventually created serious embarrassment for the Conservative government in Britain, became a touchstone of US and British policy toward Batista’s regime, and of Anglo-American cooperation.

真實的你

West Street Building (now 90 West Street), so-called ‘Pink Tide’), from the rise of China, and from the growing globalisation of trade, industry, and finance. British policy, meanwhile, remained inconsistent, and the results of its relaunch in 2010 with the announcement of the ‘Canning Agenda’ are uncertain.