Titlebook: Britain and the Congo Crisis, 1960–63; Alan James Book 1996 Alan James 1996 communism.independence.India.Policy.sovereignty.United Nations

PACT

抗體

Self-Care: Without You There Is No PhDsponsibility to be placed squarely where it belongs: for policy, on the policy makers; and for its efficient implementation, on those who translate it into action in the field. If the latter are uncertain about the interpretation of policy in any particular circumstance, they can seek guidance. The

小母馬

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14194-2esentative, Dr Conor Cruise O’Brien. Britain’s general policy towards Katanga was very clear. She was opposed to its declaration of secession, made at the outset of the crisis; refused to give its secessionist posture any direct aid or comfort; and regularly called for Katanga’s return to the Congol

繼而發(fā)生

saphenous-vein

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9351-8t by either the UN or the Central Government. In only one possible circumstance was she willing to consider a qualification of this line: when a communist regime appeared or threatened so to do. She . ready to contemplate the smothering of any such development through some proactive toughness. But e

cyanosis

OTHER

pulmonary-edema

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-87130-5the large Congo operation. Not the least of these was financial. The Soviet Union and her associates had refused to pay for the UN Force established during the 1956 Suez crisis, which in 1962 was still in being. They responded similarly to the costs of the Congo Force, as did France. Some other memb

animated

http://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/190898.jpg

可憎

Britain in the Post-War Worldably through its adverse impact on her economic strength. But she remained in the first rank, one of the Big Three. She may well have been the least of this trio. But that she was without doubt a member of it was, for her and others, the essential point. She could and did look forward to being a leader in the post-war world.