Titlebook: Bourdieu and Marx; Practices of Critiqu Gabriella Paolucci Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen

離開就切除

Bourdieu, Marx, and the Economyhis distance from Marxist economic theorizing, as he did, moreover, with those operated in the two other great economic “paradigms”: neoclassical and Keynesian, but also various theoretical traditions, which he saw as toolboxes more than reference spaces in which he would navigate. Early reader of .

Condyle

Marx and Bourdieu: From the Economy to the Economies other intellectual debts and footprints. First of all, the paper briefly notes the international context of the Marx-Bourdieu relation and references this debate in Latin America..Subsequently, the article presents the central features of the Bourdieusian “economy of practices” pointing out the lin

headlong

Bourdieu, Marxism and Law: Between Radical Criticism and Political Responsibilityof Althusser and Thompson. Firstly, it shows Bourdieu’s relationship with Marx through a case of misinterpretation concerning practical obedience to law. Then it tries to highlight how Bourdieu develops certain features of his sociology in opposition to and in dialogue with Althusser and Thompson, p

Anal-Canal

友好關(guān)系

Bourdieu’s Lesson: Marx vs. Althusser?ence. This essay aims to analyse, from a rhetorical and political point of view—because this is the level on which the two speeches under examination are built—one of the moments of harshest criticism that Bourdieu addressed to Althusser. A critique that Bourdieu formulated in 1975, starting from th

Benzodiazepines

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8570-8exts of Marx. It shows some overlap but considerable divergence in Bourdieu’s idea that states attempt to monopolize the means of symbolic violence, which for Bourdieu, more than for Marx, is key to controlling the social order. And it offers some intellectual field perspectives on the way Bourdieu relates to Marx’s texts.

COMMA

Culmination

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-937-0represents Bourdieu’s constant dialectical reference. Once foregrounded these two aspects, religion will appear not just as an essential element in the definition of Bourdieu’s notion of field, but also as an object of permanent critique because it is the foundation of every critique of society and its structures.

blight

Coeval

Bourdieu, Marxism and Law: Between Radical Criticism and Political Responsibility1990s in favour of public service and Welfare State. Indeed, it shows a Marxian ancestry in the constant concern to link the analysis and critique of normativity to power relations and social struggles, as emerges from the confrontation between Bourdieu and the Durkheimian-derived juridical perspectives.