找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science; Proceedings of the B Robert S. Cohen,Marx W. Wartofsky Conference proceedings 1969 D. Reidel P

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 喜悅
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 21:16:37 | 只看該作者
Grundlagen und Entwicklung der LogistikIn this talk. I shall take the liberty to confine myself to purely subjective ideas. In keeping with the spirit of the Symposium, I will not enter into technical details of any kind. By the same token, and so as to avoid the impression that I attempted a comprehensive learned survey of the field, I shall refrain from quoting any references.
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 03:44:22 | 只看該作者
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 08:26:12 | 只看該作者
,Comments on ‘Causality Requirements and the Theory of Relativity’,Perhaps the most important point made in Havas’ paper is his emphasis on the need for theoretical physics to come to terms with the full implications of the theory of relativity; and, indeed, to achieve a much better understanding of just what those implications are.
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 09:33:45 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:37:01 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 21:09:18 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 00:03:19 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:32:32 | 只看該作者
Causality Requirements and the Theory of Relativity,sense, we shall be concerned here with three theories of relativity, the one associated with Newtonian physics, and Einstein’s special and general theory. The groups to be considered are those associated with transformations of the space-time coordinates, and thus the physics underlying them is that
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 09:44:08 | 只看該作者
Matter, Space and Logic,rn persistent over the entire length in which the levels tend to group themselves into three levels of increasing abstraction: theories of matter and mechanics, theories of space and geometry, and theories of logic. Running along the woof is a second pattern, a sequence of discovery pursued first at
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:57:38 | 只看該作者
Is Logic Empirical?,then want to raise the question: could some of the ‘necessary truths’ of logic ever turn out to be false .? I shall argue that the answer to this question is in the affirmative, and that logic is, in a certain sense, a natural science.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 17:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
崇信县| 仁化县| 信宜市| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 定日县| 东阳市| 南和县| 奈曼旗| 临泉县| 论坛| 全椒县| 鸡泽县| 山东省| 汉中市| 上林县| 安化县| 巢湖市| 荃湾区| 孟州市| 黑龙江省| 龙胜| 青阳县| 罗城| 工布江达县| 濮阳县| 营山县| 炎陵县| 和政县| 娄底市| 松江区| 綦江县| 阜新市| 延安市| 泌阳县| 隆尧县| 依兰县| 全南县| 荔浦县| 平顺县| 唐山市| 淮北市|