找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Borrowing Justification for Proportionality; On the Influence of Jo?o Andrade Neto Book 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 Judicial

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 宗派
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:21:23 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 15:30:39 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02263-1Judicial Borrowing; Principles Theory; Constitutional Migration; Robert Alexy; Supreme Federal Court of
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:00:09 | 只看該作者
Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 01:19:55 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 03:08:07 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:05:03 | 只看該作者
Introduction,ogical and methodological choices that conform the study. Proportionality has originated in Germany, where it has performed a central role in the adjudication of disputes concerning fundamental rights. The Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) has enthusiastically resorted to the test, remarkably to
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 13:37:52 | 只看該作者
On the Migration of Proportionality, test as a normative argument. It starts providing an overview of the specialized literature on the migration of proportionality and its reception in Brazil, where it has served the Supreme Federal Court (STF). Section?. briefly reconstructs the three phases of the historical development of proporti
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 18:34:51 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:55:47 | 只看該作者
A System of Rules and Principles,e either rules or principles in accordance with the principles theory. My task is not to confront whether the Federal Constitution allows one to conceive it as such a set of rules and principles, as this has not been under dispute in Brazil. I shall show instead that the STF’s understanding on princ
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:35:46 | 只看該作者
A Charter of Rights with Wide Scope, approach to rights (and which of their variant forms) provides the best understanding of the constitution. The two main rival approaches reflect the dominant legal practice in the U.S. and in Germany. In attempt to grasp the features of fundamental rights as they appeared in the case law of the Ger
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 20:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
浦东新区| 霍山县| 铁力市| 南投市| 白朗县| 井冈山市| 论坛| 湘阴县| 田东县| 台北市| 瑞安市| 广丰县| 汕头市| 启东市| 苍山县| 涿州市| 阳曲县| 墨江| 南丰县| 故城县| 西贡区| 临清市| 来凤县| 黔江区| 本溪市| 林芝县| 江陵县| 汤阴县| 惠州市| 民勤县| 如东县| 上虞市| 富民县| 涞源县| 浦江县| 札达县| 隆子县| 辛集市| 房产| 方山县| 榆树市|