Titlebook: Beyond Legitimation; Essays on the Proble Donald Wiebe Book 1994 Donald Wiebe 1994 Immanuel Kant.philosophy of religion.religion.religious

indigenous

graphy

Comprehensiveness: The Integrity of Anglican Theologyn fifteen years ago Ninian Smart, from whom the above epigraph derives, felt compelled to draw attention to ‘the intellectual crisis of British Christianity which, oddly it seems, thrives unnoticed’.. Indeed, he found the entire situation ‘shocking and ludicrous’and so to require the ‘promotion of a

AGGER

The Ambiguous Revolution: Kant on the Nature of Faithle, Kant’s theology diverges radically from tradition.. While rejecting the traditional proofs as a foundation for a knowledge of God (God’s existence, etc.) as wholly inadequate, he nevertheless remained a theist. Unwilling to believe in God in the absence of good reasons for doing so, however, he

發(fā)炎

無法治愈

An Unholy Alliance? The Creationists’ Quest for Scientific Legitimation given our present state of knowledge it must be taken as being beyond reasonable doubt. This is not to say that in its present form it provides us with a wholly adequate account and explanation of all biological phenomena.. Hardly anyone, especially biologists and philosophers of biology, would wan

perimenopause

偏離

Has Philosophy of Religion a Place in the Agenda of Theology?logy are in themselves is not at all clear — all three being hotly contested notions on which agreement is seldom achieved and never widespread. I shall, nevertheless, attempt an answer to the question, despite the difficulties, proceeding on the basis of provisional characterizations of its three central concepts.

袋鼠

Book 1994ience relationship that does not assume they must be compatible. That examination, in the final analysis, reveals a fundamental contradiction in the compatibility system building programme which more than suggests that religious belief (knowledge) is beyond legitimation.

urethritis

FLORA

Jo Inge Bekkevold,Geoffrey Tilllogy are in themselves is not at all clear — all three being hotly contested notions on which agreement is seldom achieved and never widespread. I shall, nevertheless, attempt an answer to the question, despite the difficulties, proceeding on the basis of provisional characterizations of its three central concepts.