找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Axiological Pluralism; Jurisdiction, Law-Ma Lucia Busatta,Carlo Casonato Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under e

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Braggart
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 10:26:59 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 14:41:24 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:42:59 | 只看該作者
Patients’ Rights at the End of Life in Chilean Juridical System. Legal and Jurisprudential Analysis onception of autonomy, which dwindles patients’ abilities of self-determination. Given such legal context, biolaw can play a key role in designing and establishing effective biojuridical models to solve conflicts between different moral values and visions, arisen in jurisdictional and para-jurisdict
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 01:38:30 | 只看該作者
Research Ethics Committeeslisation. Lastly, I will provide some practical information as a member of two research ethics committees in Spain, the Bioethics Committee at the University of Barcelona and the Research Ethics Committee at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, to draw some conclusions and make proposals.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 03:51:20 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:12:47 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 13:24:12 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:33:17 | 只看該作者
Introduction,ffered by the technological development daily pose new issues and challenges. Parliaments should intervene to accommodate this pluralism, but they are often late in providing rules, and courts have to stand in for them.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:28:49 | 只看該作者
Professional Medical EthicsMEs from a comparative perspective, the present essay sketches some of the most significant and multifaceted interactions between the law and the CME, stressing how professional ethics is at the same time an element of axiological and legal pluralism (“inside” and “outside” the profession) and a tool that (potentially) accommodates pluralism.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:54:55 | 只看該作者
Patients’ Rights at the End of Life in Chilean Juridical System. Legal and Jurisprudential Analysis apid evolution of new healthcare quandaries and define a legal way to regulate healthcare practices at the end of life, as well as to delimit normative impact of them in our society, within so sensitive axiological contexts such as individual autonomy and the right to self-determine the vital project.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-20 23:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
郓城县| 宁化县| 九寨沟县| 旬阳县| 洛阳市| 黄浦区| 上虞市| 定日县| 内丘县| 隆林| 通州区| 洛宁县| 河津市| 宁津县| 兴隆县| 钟祥市| 玛多县| 莱阳市| 长寿区| 蓬溪县| 霍州市| 股票| 靖宇县| 鄢陵县| 米林县| 锡林郭勒盟| 娄烦县| 汝州市| 长沙县| 于田县| 汪清县| 慈溪市| 兖州市| 马山县| 日喀则市| 永和县| 东至县| 秭归县| 昌黎县| 桐梓县| 长子县|