找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: A Pragmatic Approach to Conceptualization of Health and Disease; Maartje Schermer,Nicholas Binney Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2024 The Editor(s) (if appl

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 劉興旺
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 17:07:44 | 只看該作者
Addiction and Its Ambiguities: Some Comments from History,ted for at least several centuries. Is addiction a sin, an individual weakness, or a brain disease? Is it caused by the substance, by the individual’s vulnerability and psychology, or by social factors? As historians have demonstrated, ideas about addiction have changed significantly over time (Acke
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:38:35 | 只看該作者
,Pragmatism in the Fray: Constructing Futures for ‘Medically Unexplained Symptoms’,ly defined disease. It is discursively related to several other concepts including ., . (DSM 5), and ., which include the diagnoses of fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple chemical sensitivity, and irritable bowel syndrome, among others. Some of these conditions are currently the object
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 23:49:06 | 只看該作者
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 05:21:15 | 只看該作者
Conceptual Engineering Health: A Historical-Philosophical Analysis of the Concept of Positive Healtg and contextualizing concepts, which implies adapting, improving or replacing them. This new view on pragmatically formulating definitions for health and disease concepts lines up with what has recently come to be known as .. In this paper we analyze and evaluate the concept of Positive Health by a
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 10:06:55 | 只看該作者
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 14:28:39 | 只看該作者
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 19:08:00 | 只看該作者
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 21:46:49 | 只看該作者
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 03:42:41 | 只看該作者
,Die kaufm?nnische Perspektive,and relative to a ‘spectrum of relativistic positions’ that I outline. The main upshot of the paper is do identify the main differences and commonalities of the three varieties of ‘historiographical medical relativism’. I defend the authors only insofar as I show that they are not per se committed to “equal-validity relativism”.
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 06:33:19 | 只看該作者
Grundfragen der Medienwirtschaftads. Historiographical relativists despise the claim that a settlement was always built on the same foundation. This raises a couple of questions: Who are these people? What are their reasons? What is more basically their general motivation? And how convincing are both—their reasons and their motivations?
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 04:28
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
平昌县| 内江市| 永德县| 江口县| 霍邱县| 阜新| 横山县| 容城县| 邯郸县| 安顺市| 晋中市| 电白县| 崇明县| 馆陶县| 拉孜县| 玉田县| 青海省| 宁夏| 青州市| 甘南县| 西安市| 武川县| 平陆县| 翁源县| 汉阴县| 德钦县| 元谋县| 唐海县| 定结县| 离岛区| 通河县| 永清县| 泗水县| 平江县| 南澳县| 宣武区| 滦平县| 沛县| 鄂托克前旗| 宝山区| 淮滨县|