找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Atlas of Tumors of the Facial Skeleton; Odontogenic and Nono Joachim Prein,Wolfgang Remagen,Erwin Uehlinger Book 1986 Springer-Verlag Berli

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 炸彈
51#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 11:01:18 | 只看該作者
Excitation of Nerve and Muscle,(Thoma and Goldman 1946). In a later classification of odontogenic tumors, ameloblastic odontoma was assigned to the group of epithelial odontogenic tumors . an inductive effect on the mesenchyma (Pindborg and Clausen 1958). Finally three forms of odontoma were defined: complex odontoma, compound od
52#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 16:10:23 | 只看該作者
53#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 19:06:25 | 只看該作者
Fundamentals of Neurophysiologyion of the jaw mentioned by Rywkind (1932), who compared it to cholesteatoma of the ear, was later identified as a calcifying odontogenic cyst (Gorlin et al. 1962; Altini and Farman 1975). The atypical case of an ameloblastoma described in 1946 by Thoma and Goldman as a “strange variant” of an amelo
54#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 20:49:37 | 只看該作者
Fundamentals of Neurophysiology they were a matrix for cyst formation at the roots of teeth. Turner (quoted in Toller 1967) later confirmed that assumption (1898), referring to the granulomas at nonvital roots as “epithelial root tumors.”
55#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 04:35:15 | 只看該作者
56#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 07:09:01 | 只看該作者
57#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 11:38:10 | 只看該作者
58#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 15:45:32 | 只看該作者
59#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 21:16:21 | 只看該作者
Cementomaia is definitely a reactive process, whereas cementoma is thought to be a true neoplasm, and cementifying fibroma and gigantiform cementoma are probably also tumorlike lesions. This led the WHO, in 1971, to establish the following categories for lesions of this group (cf. Pindborg and Kramer 1971):
60#
發(fā)表于 2025-4-1 01:12:05 | 只看該作者
Cementifying Fibromaia” (Pindborg and Hj?rting-Hansen 1974). As mentioned in Chapter 7, all lesions designated by the terms listed above were formerly classified as cemen-tomas. Thus, statistical data published before introduction of the WHO classification in 1971 are unreliable.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 07:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
苍梧县| 江达县| 桐梓县| 蚌埠市| 巩义市| 巫溪县| 瑞丽市| 攀枝花市| 清流县| 高清| 耿马| 乐都县| 中卫市| 梁山县| 华宁县| 大连市| 南岸区| 伽师县| 潮安县| 瑞安市| 盐城市| 深州市| 浦北县| 桑植县| 瑞昌市| 恩平市| 峨山| 新巴尔虎左旗| 南昌市| 宜阳县| 武鸣县| 卓尼县| 延边| 齐河县| 镇原县| 南华县| 南昌市| 宣城市| 青海省| 阿拉善盟| 山东省|