Titlebook: Aspects of Face Processing; Hadyn D. Ellis,Malcolm A. Jeeves,Andy Young Book 1986 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1986 Syndrom.c

后天習(xí)得

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-5203-0recognized” as entities having been previously seen, even if they have actually not been previously seen. It is thought that this is because more than any other category member, they summarize, or represent, attributes of the category.

預(yù)感

逗它小傻瓜

Flash MX Application And Interface Designrey, 1977; Flin, 1980; Thomson, 1984). Diamond & Carey (1977) have shown that children under the age of 10 years experienced great difficulty in recognizing a photograph of a person when that person was wearing different headgear. Thomson (1984) found age and context effects on person recognition interacted.

煉油廠

Perception of Upside-Down Faces: An Analysis from the Viewpoint of Cue Saliencyce processing systems. And they added that “there is at present little evidence to support the idea of uniqueness, but good supporting evidence for the specificity to faces of at least some components of the face processing system” (p.193).

態(tài)學(xué)

Face Recognition: More Than a Feeling of Familiarity?rey, 1977; Flin, 1980; Thomson, 1984). Diamond & Carey (1977) have shown that children under the age of 10 years experienced great difficulty in recognizing a photograph of a person when that person was wearing different headgear. Thomson (1984) found age and context effects on person recognition interacted.

cumulative

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10532-6ed periods of time. Recognition accuracy held at approximately the 90% level until nearly 35 years after graduation, whereupon it declined to about the 75% level at 48 years. Memories of this strength have been characterized more recently by Bahrick (1984) as having entered “permastore.”

inhibit

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10532-6more abstract code than inner speech. The present contribution assumes (and will provide evidence for this assumption) that, in some sense, visual and verbal information involve different processes and addresses the question of whether an additional system for processing faces should be assumed.

canvass

令人心醉

Face Recognition is not Unique: Evidence from Individual Differencesmore abstract code than inner speech. The present contribution assumes (and will provide evidence for this assumption) that, in some sense, visual and verbal information involve different processes and addresses the question of whether an additional system for processing faces should be assumed.

nephritis

Aspects of Face Processing978-94-009-4420-6Series ISSN 0258-123X