Titlebook: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence; Guillermo Simari,Iyad Rahwan Book 2009 Springer-Verlag US 2009 Bayesian network.agents.argument

使服水土

Argumentation and Game Theoryor their argumentative goals to be achieved. What we mean by arguing strategically is that instead of making arbitrary arguments, an agent would carefully choose its argumentative moves in order to further its own objectives.

collagenase

Book 2009sking for r- sons behind behaviour. And argumentation is more than ‘reasoning’ in the recesses of single minds, since it crucially involves interaction. It cements the coordinated social behaviour that has allowed us, in small bands of not particularly physically impressive primates, to dominate the

設(shè)施

拋物線

罐里有戒指

disputation, in Greek Ant- uity, but also in India and China. And logicians like me would like to return to this broader agenda of rational agency and intelligent interaction. Of course, Aristotle also gave us 978-1-4899-8427-2978-0-387-98197-0

BROOK

extract

Experimental Methods in Hydraulic Researchrrect, by some appropriate standard of proof, by examining the errors of reasoning we make when we try to use arguments. These errors have long been called fallacies, and the logic textbooks have for over 2000 years tried to help students to identify these fallacies, and to deal with them when they

逃避責(zé)任

積云

Rengarajan Sriram,Gopalan Jagadeeshcent studies on argumentation [23, 34, 35, 4] have shown that another kind of interaction may exist between the arguments. Indeed, an argument can attack another argument, but it can also support another one. This suggests a notion of bipolarity, .. the existence of two independent kinds of informat

Prostaglandins