找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪(fǎng)問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations; Steve Oswald,Thierry Herman,Jér?me Jacquin Book 2018 Sprin

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Baleful
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 23:06:30 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7835-1el analysis of .’s occurrences in a corpus of opinion articles, this study (i) shows that appearance verbs work as indicators of defeasible reasoning, and (ii) provides a systematic methodology to trace back the roots of defeasibility in the inferential configuration of arguments. As a theoretical o
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 03:43:13 | 只看該作者
Antonia Marazioti,Georgios T. Stathopoulostives, the paradox that cognitive approaches to connectives give rise to, the role of . in argumentation, and the issue of the contribution of connectives to argumentation. In the analysis I show how the contrast between sequences with and without connectives can be thought in a more general framewo
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 09:11:50 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 12:05:21 | 只看該作者
Marco Chiarandini,Yuri Goegebeurll because of the lack of relevance (in the sense of Sperber and Wilson in Relevance. Communication and cognition. Blackwell, Oxford, .) of . in comparison with that of actual points. Notions of retractability and the explicit-implicit divide are central to our approach.
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 17:09:59 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02538-9is argumentation-based interpretive mechanism will be applied to the analysis of medical interviews in the area of diabetes care, and will be used to bring to light the sources of misunderstanding and the different presumptions that define distinct cultures. We will consequently illustrate the analy
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 18:29:09 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52256-8umentative indicators in discourse: a pragma-dialectical study, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, .), I take it that identifying argumentative indicators is in principle fruitful as it refines the analytic tools used to examine argumentative practices. However, as the examination in this chapter sho
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:25:29 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:37:54 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 07:01:11 | 只看該作者
Style and Grammar in Political Discourse: Complementation and Its Argumentative-Rhetorical Potentiale analysis of political discourse. The way the Dutch radical populist Geert Wilders uses complementation serves as a case study to that end. In the first half of the contribution, an in-depth description of the phenomenon of complementation is given; it is argued that the use of complementation affe
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 13:34:36 | 只看該作者
Evidential and Argumentative Functions of Dynamic Appearance Verbs in Italian: The Example of , and rgumentative discourse. In argumentative discourse, evidential markers and strategies can be hypothesized to function as “argumentative indicators” (van Eemeren et al. in Argumentative indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study. Springer, Dordrecht, .) by contributing to signal argumentativ
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-20 23:45
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
岳阳县| 青川县| 建宁县| 同仁县| 昔阳县| 安吉县| 长宁县| 衡阳县| 巴青县| 永昌县| 丹阳市| 阿拉善左旗| 筠连县| 青岛市| 民县| 万年县| 沙湾县| 顺昌县| 光山县| 革吉县| 清新县| 象山县| 巴中市| 江口县| 德令哈市| 芜湖市| 宕昌县| 邵武市| 吉木萨尔县| 渭源县| 临泉县| 壤塘县| 东阳市| 永嘉县| 宿松县| 涟源市| 保靖县| 德州市| 常州市| 澜沧| 凤台县|