Titlebook: Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective; Frans H. van Eemeren Textbook 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 Pragma-Dial

gloomy

書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective被引頻次




書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective年度引用




書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective讀者反饋




書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

REIGN

Frans H. van EemerenOffers an introduction into argumentation theory viewed from a novel perspective.Coverage creates an interdisciplinary pragma-dialectical perspective.Provides readers with a better and more complete u

入伍儀式

Expurgate

概觀

SLAY

擋泥板

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13643-6e the methodological starting points of the theorizing. First the required functionalization of argumentation theory is discussed and it is described how this meta-theoretical principle is to be substantiated. Functionalization makes up of an approach of argumentation that is merely structural. Seco

Ambiguous

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13643-6he merits. It is explained that a critical discussion encompasses four stages: the confrontation stage, the opening stage, the argumentation stage, and the concluding stage. Next the argumentative moves that are instrumental in each of these stages are described in terms of speech acts. After the no

Eulogy

混沌

Experimental Innovations in Surface Scienceve relevance of argumentative moves, on the other hand, descriptive empirical research of argumentative discourse is reported. First attention is paid to qualitative research of argumentative indicators that are used by ordinary arguers in interpreting argumentative moves. Next an overview is provid