Titlebook: Anthropology and Development; Lucy Mair Textbook 1984Latest edition Lucy Mair 1984 anthropology.capitalism.Distribution.economic policy.ec

無關(guān)緊要

Einführung in die Festk?rperphysik policy sincerely wish . to increase general productivity ., as far as they can, to better the lot of the poorest among their people. Even more important, it assumes an environment in which this will be possible. It assumes that laws will be made, not for show, but with the intention of enforcing th

帳單

Grundlagen der Festigkeitslehre,of the world’s nations are supposed to have attained. Those which have not yet reached it used to be called ‘underdeveloped’. This offended them, and now they are said to be ‘less developed’; LDCs (less developed countries) is no longer a colloquial abbreviation but a technical term. The ‘developed’ ones may be called, quite simply, rich.

URN

http://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/158294.jpg

Reservation

勤勞

What is Development?,of the world’s nations are supposed to have attained. Those which have not yet reached it used to be called ‘underdeveloped’. This offended them, and now they are said to be ‘less developed’; LDCs (less developed countries) is no longer a colloquial abbreviation but a technical term. The ‘developed’

強壯

Modes of Livelihood, food and shelter — directly from the resources of their own environment. They live on grain that they grow themselves, or on the meat and milk of their herds, and build their own houses of local materials. Such peoples from time immemorial have bartered what surplus they had with their neighbours,

揭穿真相

凹室

Land Rights, Land Reform, Land Improvement,ding varieties of crop and the fertilizers, pesticides, and so on, on which the high yields depend, and the legal, that is the rules determining the cultivator’s access to the land. The latter question, the one on which anthropologists have something to say, has both moral and technical aspects. Ver

concubine

相容

Equality,ic revolution, the French, had as its watchword ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity’. Both phrases applied in the beginning to equality of political rights, and both were at first associated with the right to possess property and use it to the best advantage. Later revolutionaries, holding that that kind