Titlebook: Animals in Tillich‘s Philosophical Theology; Abbey-Anne Smith Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 creation.exis

中產(chǎn)階級(jí)

書目名稱Animals in Tillich‘s Philosophical Theology影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Animals in Tillich‘s Philosophical Theology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animals in Tillich‘s Philosophical Theology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Animals in Tillich‘s Philosophical Theology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animals in Tillich‘s Philosophical Theology被引頻次




書目名稱Animals in Tillich‘s Philosophical Theology被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animals in Tillich‘s Philosophical Theology年度引用




書目名稱Animals in Tillich‘s Philosophical Theology年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animals in Tillich‘s Philosophical Theology讀者反饋




書目名稱Animals in Tillich‘s Philosophical Theology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

mucous-membrane

978-3-319-82202-0The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017

桉樹

Albinism

Malcontent

MULTI

最小

Rym Ayadi,Emrah Arbak,Willem Pieter De Groento the burning issues of human life’. Unlike Barth, who was an exponent primarily of . theology, Tillich employed apologetic and answering or mediating theology, that is, a theology which allows for a contextual interpretation of the message or meaning of Christianity in our ever-changing day-to-day

Desert

Rym Ayadi,Emrah Arbak,Willem Pieter De Groenvation. Although it still has a humanocentric emphasis in its formation in ., it does nonetheless provide a solid theological basis for the construction of an animal ethic which affirms that the whole of creation has worth in the eyes of its Creator. This insight might seem obvious, but has in fact

難解

Conclusions and Recommendations, and Creator. As a doctrine related to our ultimate concern, ‘the Fall’ is viewed as symbolic and mythic rather than in literal terms. It should not be understood to be the narrative of an event that took place ‘once upon a time’. Instead, Tillich understands the story of Genesis 1–3 to be a myth th

惡意

Yasuyuki Sawada,Minhaj Mahmud,Naohiro KitanoIn the following section, Tillich’s concept of reason is examined to establish whether or not he gives an adequate account of its implications under the influence of existential distortion, especially in relation to nonhuman animals.