Titlebook: Animal Rights; Moral Theory and Pra Mark Rowlands Book 2009Latest edition Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 20

共同確定為確

Muhammed Emrullah Güven,Ahmet Murat Ermi?e are going to have to attribute to animals such states as preferences or desires, or states of pleasure and pain, happiness and unhappiness. If Regan’s rights-based approach is to work, we are going to have to regard at least some animals — the ones that make moral claims on us — as subjects-of-a-l

Sinus-Node

http://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/157673.jpg

sed-rate

exhibit

演繹

,Utilitarianism and Animals: Peter Singer’s Case for Animal Liberation,s of what exactly transpires in our treatment of non-humans — in factory farming, medical research, product testing, and so on — is, to a significant extent, due to the wide circulation of his work. Consequently, anyone who cares about the welfare of non-human animals must acknowledge an enormous de

肉體

Tom Regan: Animal Rights as Natural Rights,account of why non-human animals should be regarded as making direct moral claims upon us. The reason, according to Regan, is that non-humans possess moral rights; and he presents an elegant and systematic theoretical underpinning for this claim. I think it is fair to regard Regan’s case as proceedi

全能

Virtue Ethics and Animals,t Plato) and, in the East, has identifiable roots in Chinese philosophy, particularly Confucianism. In more recent Western philosophy, virtue ethics became largely moribund after the Enlightenment (although was certainly the dominant approach before that), and stayed that way until it was revived, a

連鎖,連串

Contractarianism and Animal Rights,f contractarian or contractualist moral theory. The canonical version of contemporary contractarianism was supplied by John Rawls, in . and subsequent writings. I am going to argue that contractarianism, of a form recognizably similar to that defended by Rawls, can be used to underwrite the moral cl

結(jié)構(gòu)

WITH