找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: An Interdisciplinary Journey from Non-Discrimination to Collective Rights ; A Critique of Equali Jessika Eichler Book 2024 The Editor(s) (i

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: burgeon
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:10:43 | 只看該作者
Neurophysiologische Korrelate der Rechnung,it makes in bringing these fields together; thirdly, engaging with the merits of interdisciplinary work when studying equality, drawing from insights from judicial studies, theory, political science, and socio-legal inquiry; and finally, presenting systemic reflections on a possible paradigm shift i
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 03:06:58 | 只看該作者
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 08:17:31 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 10:33:52 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 15:13:53 | 只看該作者
Equality Principles and Institutionalism: Judicial Spill-Overs and Dialoguesnifestations of equality as well as their social complexity, these being addressed by Equality Bodies. Critical voices however draw our attention to their prospective politization, stressing the importance of their independence.
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 20:24:49 | 只看該作者
Equality Paradigms and Contemporary Politics of Recognitione of a culturally homogenous State: the normative (the ‘ought to’ question relating to equality paradigms or differentiated treatment) and the empirical (‘on the ground realities’ of inequalities) enter a contested field of negotiation here with often contrasting portrayals of societal (in)equality.
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:21:22 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:11:45 | 只看該作者
Exploring Counterbalancing Paradigms: Positive Discrimination and Collectivisation of ‘inclusive equality’. The duty to fulfil in particular appears to correlate with substantive equality principles, further specifying and contextualising equality, often in consideration of minority situations. While international human rights law would certainly be considered as the most influen
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 06:50:22 | 只看該作者
Collective Subject-Holdership, Processes and Scales of Collectivisational standing rights. Scales of collectivisation broadly draw lines of demarcation between pro forma rights or formal equality and substantive change or genuinely inclusive rights which shall assist us in measuring the legal value of collective rights in contemporary orders comparatively. The followin
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:26:46 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-22 21:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
达尔| 和静县| 安庆市| 府谷县| 同仁县| 镇安县| 泉州市| 托克逊县| 三门县| 天祝| 大悟县| 邯郸市| 四平市| 颍上县| 马关县| 谷城县| 九寨沟县| 林州市| 碌曲县| 无为县| 鹤壁市| 安化县| 普格县| 彭水| 奉新县| 陆河县| 巴塘县| 西丰县| 封丘县| 南汇区| 曲水县| 萨迦县| 略阳县| 宕昌县| 翼城县| 宁化县| 鲁山县| 同江市| 徐闻县| 伊川县| 江西省|