找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: An Approach to Rights; Studies in the Philo Carl Wellman Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997 Autonomy.Policy.Politics.

[復(fù)制鏈接]
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 23:11:39 | 只看該作者
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 01:31:25 | 只看該作者
Interpreting the Bill of Rights: Alternative Conceptions of Rights,The Bill of Rights constitutes an immensely valuable part of our constitutional law. Presumably, this is why we have celebrated its two hundredth anniversary. But what is constitutional law, really? Let us begin by recalling two diametrically opposed views.
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 08:53:15 | 只看該作者
Law and Philosophy Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/154850.jpg
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:13:03 | 只看該作者
Legal Rights,o show how the expression ‘a(chǎn) right’ is used indiscriminately to refer to any kind of legal advantage. He went on to argue that this established usage fails to distinguish between four very different legal conceptions — a claim, a liberty, a power, and an immunity (Hohfeld 1919, pp. 23–64).
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:59:45 | 只看該作者
Violence, Law, and Basic Rights,degree. A single contributor, like myself, would do best to confine himself to some small portion of the philosophical issues involved. Because the only thing I know very much about is the theory of rights, I shall explore the relations between violence and basic rights.
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 19:02:46 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91886-0 choices and acting morally. Still, I received my philosophical education in the United States and in a period when metaethics of the most abstract sort was all the fashion. This probably explains why only after publishing one book on the meaning of ethical sentences and another on the justification
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 23:07:05 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 02:12:56 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03491-7o show how the expression ‘a(chǎn) right’ is used indiscriminately to refer to any kind of legal advantage. He went on to argue that this established usage fails to distinguish between four very different legal conceptions — a claim, a liberty, a power, and an immunity (Hohfeld 1919, pp. 23–64).
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 06:41:47 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24838-3d for privacy arising from converging ecological, cultural, technical and social changes. The population explosion together with modern urbanization have made it much more difficult for the individual to get away, physically and psychologically, from the crowd of strangers around him. The growing al
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:55:46 | 只看該作者
Die Macht der Worte und der Medienrmed consent. Precisely why this is, or even might be, wrong remains something of a mystery because most of the rapidly growing literature dealing with consent in medical ethics is more concerned with the application of this requirement to problematic cases than with its theoretical justification. A
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 06:21
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
德令哈市| 连城县| 石狮市| 理塘县| 巴南区| 金华市| 泾阳县| 宽城| 寿宁县| 天峨县| 恩施市| 上虞市| 莱西市| 冕宁县| 康保县| 柘城县| 福海县| 闸北区| 乐昌市| 平塘县| 大港区| 双城市| 高淳县| 凌海市| 浠水县| 蓬溪县| 洛南县| 五台县| 辽宁省| 高密市| 娄底市| 隆安县| 遂平县| 吴旗县| 高陵县| 宜兰市| 都匀市| 凤翔县| 益阳市| 海南省| 贵南县|