找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: American Politics in the Age of Ignorance: Why Lawmakers Choose Belief over Research; David Schultz Book 2013 David Schultz 2013 democracy

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 24366|回復(fù): 41
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:15:03 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱American Politics in the Age of Ignorance: Why Lawmakers Choose Belief over Research
影響因子2023David Schultz
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/155/154570/154570.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: American Politics in the Age of Ignorance: Why Lawmakers Choose Belief over Research;  David Schultz Book 2013 David Schultz 2013 democracy
影響因子American Politics in the Age of Ignoranc e looks at ten policy myths and bad ideas that governments and public officials - most often conservatives - consistently repeat and re-enact. Acting on these myths, the policies inevitably fail and thereby reinforce preconceived beliefs that government is ineffective at solving problems.
Pindex Book 2013
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱American Politics in the Age of Ignorance: Why Lawmakers Choose Belief over Research影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱American Politics in the Age of Ignorance: Why Lawmakers Choose Belief over Research影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱American Politics in the Age of Ignorance: Why Lawmakers Choose Belief over Research網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱American Politics in the Age of Ignorance: Why Lawmakers Choose Belief over Research網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱American Politics in the Age of Ignorance: Why Lawmakers Choose Belief over Research被引頻次




書目名稱American Politics in the Age of Ignorance: Why Lawmakers Choose Belief over Research被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱American Politics in the Age of Ignorance: Why Lawmakers Choose Belief over Research年度引用




書目名稱American Politics in the Age of Ignorance: Why Lawmakers Choose Belief over Research年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱American Politics in the Age of Ignorance: Why Lawmakers Choose Belief over Research讀者反饋




書目名稱American Politics in the Age of Ignorance: Why Lawmakers Choose Belief over Research讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:22:46 | 只看該作者
Methodisches Vorgehen/Empirischer Zugang,policy makers are well versed about the subjects they address. Unfortunately studies suggest that many American citizens and public officials are woefully ignorant about many facts critical to making informed decisions. The result is that often times many policies and ideas get enacted either when t
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:23:24 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:10:02 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-26237-5determinant affecting economic behavior. They contend high taxes are a detriment to economic growth and that tax cuts will help induce economic growth and relocation of businesses. The reality is that in many cases, taxes have marginal impact upon economic behavior, and they generally rank low in te
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:46:35 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:39:24 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8457-9 the myth of homo economicus, the economic man, a person who is an omniscient, rational calculator motivated by economic or other similar benefits. Policy makers often assume that specific populations are motivated by certain values or are in possession of knowledge or motives that they actually do
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:57:03 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:36:48 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:09:12 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:21:30 | 只看該作者
Book 2013American Politics in the Age of Ignoranc e looks at ten policy myths and bad ideas that governments and public officials - most often conservatives - consistently repeat and re-enact. Acting on these myths, the policies inevitably fail and thereby reinforce preconceived beliefs that government is ineffective at solving problems.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 08:02
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
金塔县| 明光市| 喀什市| 依兰县| 博爱县| 九江市| 安多县| 五台县| 白沙| 郯城县| 舟山市| 扶风县| 永丰县| 景洪市| 茌平县| 繁峙县| 原平市| 峡江县| 奉化市| 方城县| 长治县| 宜阳县| 迁西县| 彩票| 承德市| 太湖县| 大余县| 四子王旗| 台中县| 合作市| 宜州市| 长宁县| 乌鲁木齐县| 平阴县| 九江市| 榆社县| 山东| 肃宁县| 东乡| 蓝田县| 金昌市|