Titlebook: After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend; Recent Issues in The Robert Nola,Howard Sankey Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

External-Otitis

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

來(lái)自于

過(guò)分自信

,Kuhn, Bayes and ‘Theory-Choice’: How Revolutionary is Kuhn’s Account of Theoretical Change?, Smith, who opined ‘I never read a book before reviewing it — it prejudices a man so!’ Another favourite — in similar (though strictly speaking contrary) vein — is from a psychologist friend of Wesley Salmon’s, who, when asked for his opinion of the latest Dianetics tosh by Lafayette Ron Hubbard, ap

Nonconformist

With Friends Like These ..., or What is Inductivism and Why is it Off the Agenda?,sive. On one side, indisputably, was Karl Popper. The name he coined for his foes had even by the 1980s no entry in the ., the ., the ., or even that repository of words too unrespectable to make such august lexica, Partridge’s .. He called them “.“.

BAN

水土

巧辦法

Methodological Pluralism, Normative Naturalism and the Realist Aim of Science,ve ground for scientific theory appraisal and acceptance. The second task is to explain how application of this methodology leads to advance toward the aim(s) of science. In other words, the goal of the theory of method is to provide an integrated explanation of both rational scientific theory choic

Notify

Hard Problems in the Philosophy of Science: Idealisation and Commensurability,ted by Hume’s problem of induction has always kept the issue of scientific truth at the forefront of philosophical research. Philosophers expended great energy in defending a broad spectrum of replies to Hume’s scepticism, ranging from the view that theories are merely instruments for the control an

AUGUR

arsenal

Criminal Profiling of Serial Arson Offenses,at energy in defending a broad spectrum of replies to Hume’s scepticism, ranging from the view that theories are merely instruments for the control and prediction of nature, to realist views of science (which hold that science aims at the truth about the world, and is rational in the pursuit of this goal).