Titlebook: Absent Management in Banking; How Banks Fail and C Christian Dinesen Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

轉變

書目名稱Absent Management in Banking影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Absent Management in Banking影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Absent Management in Banking網絡公開度




書目名稱Absent Management in Banking網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Absent Management in Banking被引頻次




書目名稱Absent Management in Banking被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Absent Management in Banking年度引用




書目名稱Absent Management in Banking年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Absent Management in Banking讀者反饋




書目名稱Absent Management in Banking讀者反饋學科排名

DEI

FOLLY

Georgios I. Doukidis,Ray J. Paulal communication, mutual criticism and intermarriages contributed to achieving banking dominance and fabulous wealth. Industrialisation, wars and revolutions almost brought down single Rothschild banks, but diversification and mutual support overcame all challenges. The Rothschilds were instrumental

流浪

裹住

Georgios I. Doukidis,Ray J. Paulworld opened up to increasing foreign investment, more banks followed the first multinational bank, Citi, and these banks became multinational with all the complex challenges this brought. Some believed that soon a few global banks would dominate, as had happened in other industries. The 1990s saw e

Cytology

J. C. Thorpe,A. Marr,R. S. Slackion of commercial deposit-taking and investment banks, with much larger combined balance sheets, enabled significantly increased trading for the banks’ own account. The mergers were often paid with shares, and many banks not already listed on stock exchanges did so in the 1980s and 1990s. Large bank

頂點

Yiran Tan,Stephen Bacchi,Weng Onn Chan for management. When banks were mainly partnerships, one incentive for the partners was to keep the bank from failing. Once banks listed on stock exchanges, incentives became shorter term. They were about a high share price of the bank rather than its survival. Annual bonuses became path?dependent

admission

靦腆

Carcinogen

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97269-1ncial crisis. Lehman Brothers’ uncontrolled growth was financed by remarkably increased leverage. Its risk management had been trumpeted as a strength, but complexity was beyond management. Incentives were vast and awarded for achieving growth. When the government refused to support Lehman Brother a