Titlebook: A Guide to Systems Research; Philosophy, Processe Mary C. Edson,Pamela Buckle Henning,Shankar Sankar Book 2017 Springer Science+Business Me

神經(jīng)

jocular

Canvas

Paul Doury,Yves Dirheimer,Serge Pattinn Framework that can yield a holistic form of systems analysis. By . is meant a natural unit that is a self-related cycle of causes. The concept of systems has been around since the earliest philosophical records. To date, we do not have a widely accepted definition. The schema we present is based o

細(xì)胞

figment

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-34683-9focus on extensions of the work of the mathematical biologist Robert Rosen to examine a formal view of whole system analysis and modeling. Rosen (.) defined modeling as the “judicious association of a formalism with such external referents” (p. 359). By . is meant following certain epistemological c

可耕種

Infiltrate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-34683-9 best systems research will evidence a systemic approach in its structure, content, and overall contribution to the field. To enable a systemic approach to systems research reporting, a researcher must frame and select from a number of considerations specific to the systems field. This chapter provi

ALIBI

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-34683-9 We begin with the ability to perceive the presence of systemic wholes and parts. Next, we consider competencies involved in perceiving key characteristics of complex systems (order, change, relationships, and information). Scholars are often called to generalize their findings to other settings; th

LUCY

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-34683-9What distinguishes systems research from other forms of research?” Defining what constitutes good systemic research requires explanation about what is missing from the current practices of research, as driven by the assumptions of science. This requires revisiting assumptions about what we know (ont

粗魯性質(zhì)