找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method; Gareth B. Matthews,S. Marc Cohen Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 自由
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:21:15 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:49:39 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 21:09:55 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 01:18:02 | 只看該作者
Gareth B. Matthews,S. Marc CohenSocratic method of questioning and refutation (elenchus) predominates the early Platonic dialogues.Early dialogues were intended to commemorate Socrates and the elenchus.Uncovering the shortcomings th
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 03:01:43 | 只看該作者
The Socratic Method, so-called Socratic elenchus. This is a species of philosophical analysis whose aim is to arrive at the definition of a problematic concept by means of subjecting alternative proposals to potential refutation by means of counterexample. Six key features of the method are delineated.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 10:01:25 | 只看該作者
Analyzing Courage: ,, but Socrates shows them all to be defective. Their efforts end in perplexity, leading us to wonder whether the elenchus, as a form of inquiry, holds out a serious prospect of leading to the discovery of what courage is.
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 13:50:42 | 只看該作者
Blameworthy Ignorance: ,are so dismal? We might hope to find an answer in the .. There we find a possible motivation for the elenchus in a principle of “epistemic purity”—the idea that one ought not to think one knows something that, in fact, one does not know.
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:10:16 | 只看該作者
Virtue in Socratic Ignorance: , will ever be entirely satisfactory? The . may provide an answer, for it raises the possibility that the virtue that is the topic of this dialogue, . (self-mastery), may actually turn out to be the limited wisdom that Socrates claims to have, namely, self-knowledge.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:47:13 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:36:02 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,re are both internal and external limitations in what the elenchus can be reasonably expected to accomplish. And Plato also thought that philosophy can do more to get beyond those limitations. Only by going beyond the elenctic method will we be able to adequately address the foundational questions of philosophy.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 22:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宁津县| 清流县| 无为县| 西畴县| 天祝| 迁安市| 阜康市| 裕民县| 珲春市| 海城市| 凤翔县| 兴化市| 吐鲁番市| 延川县| 牡丹江市| 通海县| 林西县| 永登县| 兴城市| 新宾| 桐城市| 富川| 中牟县| 黔江区| 彭州市| 滕州市| 洛川县| 秦安县| 信阳市| 泌阳县| 济源市| 永康市| 山西省| 上栗县| 天峨县| 兴义市| 永胜县| 郑州市| 阜阳市| 西吉县| 永和县|