Titlebook: Welfare State Reforms Seen from Below; Comparing Public Att Bernhard Ebbinghaus,Elias Naumann Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T

Incommensurate

Class, Union, or Party Allegiance? Comparing Pension Reform Preferences in Britain and Germanyand supporters of political parties, defend the status quo or are willing to support reforms. It distinguishes two major dimensions of pension-specific attitudes, retrenchment and redistribution. Using data from the 2008 European Social Survey, the study compares two countries with different pension

過時

Accede

Legion

Trust in Ageing Societies: Confidence in Pensions Across Europe ageing or the financial crisis led to an erosion of confidence in pensions. Moreover, it examined whether there are some institutional designs and pension reforms that are able to foster trust. The results confirm the general expectation that problem pressures lead to lower confidence in pensions.

專心

Does Population Ageing Change Pension Reform Attitudes? A Survey Experiment on Political Knowledge, viduals change their attitudes in hard times is still limited. Relying on a survey experiment in a representative German online survey, this chapter exogenously manipulates the perceived pressure to reform (due to an ageing society). It shows that people indeed change their reform preferences when f

ARCHE

DAMP

Abduct

Book 2018ct to policy change. It highlights that welfare states are hard pressed to reform in order to cope with ongoing socio-economic and demographic challenges. While public opinion is commonly seen to oppose welfare cuts and organized interests such as trade unions have tended to defend acquired social r

抱狗不敢前

Positions of Interest Groups Towards Labour Market Reforms in Germany: A Novel Content Analysis of Ptrategies depending on their (potential) membership. The service unions in Germany strongly advocate the minimum wage while industrial unions focus on stricter regulation of atypical employment. The positions of social welfare organizations are shaped by their dual role as representatives of the marginalized and as employers in the social sector.

藐視