標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making; Lewis Betts Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Cold War.Nucle [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: 美麗動(dòng)人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:38
書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making被引頻次
書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making年度引用
書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making讀者反饋
書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 搖擺 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:44 作者: Medicare 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:42
,The Ministry of Supply and the Radical Review: 1953–1954,s activities as Minister of Defence, and to ascertain the degree to which these experiences led him to become wedded to the ideas contained in his 1957 White Paper to the extent that he continued to champion them long after their impracticalities had been made apparent. In order to show the consiste作者: Interferons 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:01 作者: 無力更進(jìn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:53
,The Struggle over the Nuclear Delivery System: 1957–1960, making him believe that defence was impossible. The next logical move on this trajectory was to ensure that Britain had its own ballistic missile, and by 1957 this was a viable option. The White Paper had not committed the government to Blue Streak, but Sandys intended for it to enter service, and 作者: 祖先 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:50
Blue Streak, interest. Unfortunately, most of the relevant German scientists had been captured by the United States and the Soviet Union, allowing them to effectively continue Germany’s work on unmanned weaponry, leaving Britain to make do with access to the Peenemünde team and some captured V-2s. This comparat作者: 祖先 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:03 作者: 耕種 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:35
Katarina Ron?evi?,Marco Rieckmannand holding a number of key posts. Most significantly, he was Minister of Defence at the time of the controversial 1957 White Paper on Defence, which set out a radical vison for the future of the British military, and would have profound effects on defence policy and the defence industry in the year作者: 性別 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:33
Chiedza N. Mutanga,Edson Gandiwa mass psychology’. He accepted that there was no evidence of ‘flying saucer aircraft’ as such, but felt that there was, nonetheless, ‘a(chǎn)mple evidence of some unfamiliar and unexplained phenomenon’. The situation seemed familiar to Sandys, who had spent a large part of the Second World War tracking th作者: EWER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:51
Chiedza N. Mutanga,Edson Gandiwas activities as Minister of Defence, and to ascertain the degree to which these experiences led him to become wedded to the ideas contained in his 1957 White Paper to the extent that he continued to champion them long after their impracticalities had been made apparent. In order to show the consiste作者: 動(dòng)作謎 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:03 作者: 永久 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:30
Tembi M. Tichaawa,Refiloe J. Lekgau making him believe that defence was impossible. The next logical move on this trajectory was to ensure that Britain had its own ballistic missile, and by 1957 this was a viable option. The White Paper had not committed the government to Blue Streak, but Sandys intended for it to enter service, and 作者: 畸形 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:39 作者: tenosynovitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:19 作者: mechanical 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:45
Lewis BettsOffers further insight into British nuclear policy-making during the Cold War.Argues that our understanding of the British Government‘s decisions must take into account Duncan Sandys.Shows the profoun作者: aviator 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:17
http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/283370.jpg作者: expository 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:23 作者: epicondylitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:44 作者: ornithology 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:28
Katarina Ron?evi?,Marco Rieckmannfficult character—we hear that Harold Macmillan thought that his prickly character might have been down to ‘German blood’, and that Ian Smith, the notably intransigent Rhodesian white minority leader with whom Sandys dealt with as Secretary of State for the Colonies, found him ‘a(chǎn)brupt, even tending 作者: Provenance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:56 作者: entice 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:32 作者: avarice 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:38
Felix G. Bello,Mathews Lambulira any coherent strategic concept. In doing so, it suggests that these accounts miss a critical element needed to form a clear understanding of British nuclear policy throughout Sandys’ period of involvement, and the central tenets of the 1957 White Paper in particular.作者: Strength 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:37
Introduction,fficult character—we hear that Harold Macmillan thought that his prickly character might have been down to ‘German blood’, and that Ian Smith, the notably intransigent Rhodesian white minority leader with whom Sandys dealt with as Secretary of State for the Colonies, found him ‘a(chǎn)brupt, even tending 作者: 多骨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:30 作者: CAB 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:13 作者: 撤退 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:24 作者: 殺蟲劑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:38
Book 2016e of Britain‘s nuclear capabilities and its approach to the Cold War.? This book shows the profound influence Sandys‘ personal belief system had on Britain‘s attempts to acquire a credible nuclear deterrent..作者: Painstaking 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:11 作者: constellation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:34 作者: 蒸發(fā) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:52 作者: 亂砍 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:24
Tembi M. Tichaawa,Refiloe J. Lekgauistic missiles, and a point was eventually reached where his apparent refusal to give fair consideration to the merits of Polaris, the submarine-launched ballistic missile system favoured by the Admiralty, caused a high-ranking admiral to complain that Sandys ‘will do all in his power to prevent any alternative to . from being even considered’..作者: 使害怕 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:24 作者: 和音 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:02
,The Ministry of Supply and the Radical Review: 1953–1954,licy-making process could thrive. This chapter follows how Sandys turned his experiences into policy preferences and considers his work at the Ministry of Supply throughout 1953 and 1954, when he was called upon to make a significant contribution to the defence policy-making process for the first time.作者: occurrence 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:57
,The Struggle over the Nuclear Delivery System: 1957–1960,istic missiles, and a point was eventually reached where his apparent refusal to give fair consideration to the merits of Polaris, the submarine-launched ballistic missile system favoured by the Admiralty, caused a high-ranking admiral to complain that Sandys ‘will do all in his power to prevent any alternative to . from being even considered’..作者: 聽寫 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:48 作者: Customary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:44
sions must take into account Duncan Sandys.Shows the profoun.This book offers new perspectives on British nuclear policy-making at the height of the Cold War, arguing that the decisions taken by the British government during the 1950s and 1960s in pursuit of its nuclear ambitions cannot be properly 作者: Traumatic-Grief 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 22:40
10樓作者: Ancestor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:41
10樓作者: 有助于 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:58
10樓
