找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?; Geoffrey S. Holtzman,Elisabeth Hildt Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 neuroet

[復制鏈接]
查看: 48743|回復: 46
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:22:01 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?
編輯Geoffrey S. Holtzman,Elisabeth Hildt
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/283/282358/282358.mp4
概述The only collection dedicated exclusively to essays addressing the implications of neuroscience for philosophical ethics.Brings together the philosophical subdisciplines of ethics and philosophy of co
叢書名稱The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology
圖書封面Titlebook: Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?;  Geoffrey S. Holtzman,Elisabeth Hildt Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 neuroet
描述.This book brings together a number of essays that are optimistic about the ways certain neuroscientific insights might advance philosophical ethics, and other essays that are more circumspect about the relevance of neuroscience to philosophical ethics. As a whole, the essays form a self-reflective body of work that simultaneously seeks to derive normative ethical implications from neuroscience, and to question whether and how that may be possible at all. In doing so, the collection brings together psychology, neuroscience, philosophy of mind, ethics, and philosophy of science. Neuroscience seeks to understand the biological systems that guide human behavior and cognition. Normative ethics, on the other hand, seeks to understand the system of abstract moral principles dictating how people ought to behave. By studying how the human brain makes moral judgments, can philosophers learn anything about the nature of morality itself? A growing number of researchers believe that neurosciencecan, indeed, provide insights into the questions of philosophical ethics. However, even these advocates acknowledge that the path from neuroscientific .is .to normative ethical .ought .can be quite frau
出版日期Book 2020
關鍵詞neuroethics; normative implications; neuroscience; prosocial behavior; mind perception and morality; mora
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5
isbn_softcover978-3-030-56136-9
isbn_ebook978-3-030-56134-5Series ISSN 1875-0044 Series E-ISSN 1875-0036
issn_series 1875-0044
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?被引頻次




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?年度引用




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?讀者反饋




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:47:11 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:11:16 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:15:37 | 只看該作者
Two Theories of Moral Cognition,tists have turned to reinforcement learning, a branch of machine learning, to develop formal, mathematical models of normative cognition. One prominent approach, proposed by Cushman (Curr Opin Behav Sci 3:58–62, 2015), suggests that moral cognition is underwritten by a habitual (‘model-free’) system
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:44:48 | 只看該作者
Rethinking Moral Motivation: How Neuroscience Supports an Alternative to Motivation Internalism,uch recent discussion focuses on the dispute between ., who hold that there is a necessary connection between moral judgment and motivation, and ., who deny this. In contrast, I argue that this relation is best seen as a . one: moral judgment . to be accompanied by the appropriate motivation. I supp
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:19:38 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:51:30 | 只看該作者
,Normative Implications of Neuroscience and Sociobiology – Intended and Perceived,ic “nature-nurture” debates, including the sociobiology controversy around Harvard biologist E. O. Wilson. Neuroscience is the field that Wilson hoped would continue his work in . (Wilson, Sociobiology: The new synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, .)?in regard to finding an evolutiona
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:11:05 | 只看該作者
Nervous Norms,a moral view in an evidence free manner seems both morally and epistemically vicious. But failing to muster an empirically informed moral view is only one way to err regarding the relationship between empirical facts and moral norms. We might also make the mistake of . on facts when engaging moral q
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:22:44 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:05:16 | 只看該作者
Autistic Moral Agency and Integrative Neuroethics, neuroscience and ethics and specifies three possible ways (solving ethical issues in specific contexts, developing normative standards that can be used to regulate and evaluate the behaviors of a group of individuals with particular cognitive abilities or disabilities, and identifying and correctin
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-27 17:12
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
万全县| 佛冈县| 肇源县| 平安县| 大冶市| 子洲县| 辉县市| 云阳县| 房产| 台江县| 汝阳县| 大理市| 临沂市| 社旗县| 盐亭县| 西畴县| 梨树县| 威海市| 团风县| 马鞍山市| 陆良县| 吐鲁番市| 闵行区| 鲁山县| 兴和县| 南康市| 许昌县| 黄石市| 大连市| 台山市| 莆田市| 枝江市| 玉龙| 淳化县| 黄平县| 卓资县| 会宁县| 瓮安县| 晋宁县| 靖宇县| 五寨县|